Concrete forms, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing · Texas

J & A Manufacturing Inc

Garland, TX · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J & A Manufacturing Inc runs at 141% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete forms, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

J & A Manufacturing Inc: 4.7 TCR = 141% of Concrete forms, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J & A Manufacturing Inc safety composite

J & A Manufacturing Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2024

J & A Manufacturing Inc injury rate improved

J & A Manufacturing Inc's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=14.5 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Garland, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 141% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #71/107
  • PHOTO BCMP North, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BCMP North, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

J & A Manufacturing Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J & A Manufacturing Inc averages 4.7 TCR (141% of the Concrete forms, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J & A Manufacturing Inc TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=14.5 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where J & A Manufacturing Inc falls in its industry

1,158 Concrete forms, sheet metal (e establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 107 Concrete forms, sheet metal (e employers in Texas.

J & A Manufacturing Inc (50 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate J & A Manufacturing Inc
J & A Manufacturing Inc (50 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

J & A Manufacturing Inc has fewer employees than the Concrete forms, sheet metal (except stam median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 4.7 0.0 2 0 0
2020 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 14.5 6.2 7 0 0
2017 7.3 3.6 4 0 0
2016 3.4 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · TX · Garland

1,158 Concrete forms, sheet metal (except stampings), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 316 employers in Garland, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BCMP North, LLC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheet Metal Fabrication Shop 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chatsworth Products Co. Chatsworth, CA. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ENERSYS INC 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1836 Farms LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwertner Farms, Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Floydada Coop Gin #1 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulf Coast Area Office 6400 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DDA2 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz Comany Garland 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR Osburn Contractors 933 FTE
NAT-TCR North East Linen Supply 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Haller Enterprises - Lititz 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Waters of Union City LLC 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Foodland 130 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allied Dies, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Memphis Fence & Construction, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flex-N-Gate Warren Stamping 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.