Commercial building construction general contractors · Maryland

J C Porter Construction

Timonium, MD · ~31 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J C Porter Construction runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

J C Porter Construction: 2.9 TCR = 101% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J C Porter Construction safety composite

J C Porter Construction scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.4

2018→2024

J C Porter Construction injury rate improved

J C Porter Construction's TCR fell 20.4 from 20.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 20.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=20.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Timonium, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #70/99
  • PHOTO Wm Blanchard Co
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wm Blanchard Co (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

J C Porter Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J C Porter Construction averages 2.9 TCR (101% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J C Porter Construction TCR series: 2018=20.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where J C Porter Construction falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 99 Commercial building constructi employers in Maryland.

J C Porter Construction (31 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate J C Porter Construction
J C Porter Construction (31 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

J C Porter Construction has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 20.4 20.4 3 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MD · Timonium

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 48 employers in Timonium, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wm Blanchard Co 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewis Contractors 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sellery Hall 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grani Installation, Inc - CA 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eichberg Construction, Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manekin Construction, LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE S.A. Comunale - District of Columbia 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE 645 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stella Maris Inc. 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Child and Family Services 575 FTE
CITY-NEAR MDROA - IS MARYLAND 443 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gallagher Services 398 FTE
NAT-TCR BW Mitchum Trucking 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR First Student 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Little Sandy Correctional Complex 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR EZ Form Cable Corp 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kerwin Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barro's Pizza, Deer Valley 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charles Hampton's A-1 Signs, Inc 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Geismar, LA 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.