Construction management, commercial and institutional building · New Jersey

Wm Blanchard Co

Springfield, NJ · ~98 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wm Blanchard Co runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade C.

Wm Blanchard Co: 2.9 TCR = 101% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wm Blanchard Co safety composite

Wm Blanchard Co scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2024

Wm Blanchard Co injury rate improved

Wm Blanchard Co's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.7 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Springfield, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #45/66
  • PHOTO J C PORTER CONSTRUCT…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J C PORTER CONSTRUCTION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Wm Blanchard Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wm Blanchard Co averages 2.9 TCR (101% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wm Blanchard Co TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.7 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 2.9

Where Wm Blanchard Co falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 66 Construction management, comme employers in New Jersey.

Wm Blanchard Co (98 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Wm Blanchard Co
Wm Blanchard Co (98 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Wm Blanchard Co has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 0.0 3 0 0
2023 3.2 0.0 3 0 0
2022 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.9 0.0 3 0 0
2018 6.7 1.1 1 5 0
2017 3.5 2.3 3 0 0
2016 4.7 2.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NJ · Springfield

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 34 employers in Springfield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J C PORTER CONSTRUCTION 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewis Contractors 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sellery Hall 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grani Installation, Inc - CA 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE ACE-Pleasantville Operations 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Richard E Pierson Materials Corporation 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ames Rubber Corporation-Hamburg 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE BWAY Corporation 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Arc of Union County 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR 70 Diamond Rd. Springfield, NJ 07081 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valcor Engineering 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baltusrol Golf Club 214 FTE
NAT-TCR C.W. Roberts Contracting Freeport Division 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NEWARK 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Express Corporate 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Rfc Il 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Penny Plate - Virginia 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redmond Thrift Store 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE FLA 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE J.H. Berra Construction Co., Inc. 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.