Base facilities operation support services · Texas

J & J Worldwide Services

Austin, TX · ~2,067 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J & J Worldwide Services runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Base facilities operation support services workplace, earning a grade B.

J & J Worldwide Services: 1.8 TCR = 70% of Base facilities operation support services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J & J Worldwide Services safety composite

J & J Worldwide Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

J & J Worldwide Services: 1.5 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2023

J & J Worldwide Services's TCR rose 0.8 from 1.5 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 70% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #17/70
  • PHOTO Maintenance/Faciliti…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 177 inj
  • SIZE ~2,067 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maintenance/Facilities & Research (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

J & J Worldwide Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J & J Worldwide Services averages 1.8 TCR (70% of the Base facilities operation support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J & J Worldwide Services TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2018=2 · 2019=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 2.6

Where J & J Worldwide Services falls in its industry

757 Base facilities operation supp establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 70 Base facilities operation supp employers in Texas.

J & J Worldwide Services (2,067 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate J & J Worldwide Services
J & J Worldwide Services (2,067 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

J & J Worldwide Services has more employees than the Base facilities operation support servic median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 1.2 45 0 0
2022 2.6 1.9 43 1 0
2021 2.6 2.5 35 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.0 1.4 33 0 0
2016 1.5 0.7 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · TX · Austin

757 Base facilities operation support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maintenance/Facilities & Research 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NVT Technologies Inc (North Carolina Office) 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bonded Filter Co. LLC / DBA BFC Solutions 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SP-ST VINCE CLAY 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE TXAME Campus 2,067 FTE
STATE-SIZE IAHCC0170 IAH - CARGO 2,067 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Regional Health Care System 2,059 FTE
STATE-SIZE 088 Texas Health Physicians Group 2,053 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR International Paper - Port Wentworth Mill 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Enviroplex 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro-Thermal Corp 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte Marriott City Center 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Joaquin General Hospital 2,067 FTE
NAT-SIZE Panst - New Stanton 2,068 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soldier Field 2,066 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caesars Atlantic City Hotel & Casino 2,065 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.