Garbage collection services · Pennsylvania

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division

Bridgeport, PA · ~229 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
31.4
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division runs at 1206% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Garbage collection services workplace, earning a grade F.

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division: 31.4 TCR = 1206% of Garbage collection services BLS 2.6 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division safety composite

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division scores safer than 0% of same-industry peers on total case rate (tcr), blended into one 0-100 breakdown. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

0/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 31.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 37.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division: 15.9 → 40.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 40.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.19× in 2024

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division's TCR rose 24.8 from 15.9 in 2016 to 40.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Bridgeport, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 31.4 · 1206% of ind

  • DART 37.4 DART
  • RANK #116/116
  • PHOTO Shank Waste Service …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 501 inj
  • SIZE ~229 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shank Waste Service Inc. (2.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division averages 31.4 TCR (1206% of the Garbage collection services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division TCR series: 2016=15.9 · 2017=23.1 · 2018=36 · 2019=31.3 · 2020=34.4 · 2021=27.8 · 2022=38.4 · 2023=34.6 · 2024=40.7 · BLS 2.6

Where J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division falls in its industry

2,322 Garbage collection services establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #116 safest of 116 Garbage collection services employers in Pennsylvania.

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division (229 employees, TCR 31.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division
J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division (229 employees, TCR 31.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

J. P. Mascaro & Sons - Bridgeport Division has more employees than the Garbage collection services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 40.7 37.4 73 0 0
2023 34.6 31.2 60 1 1
2022 38.4 34.5 76 1 0
2021 27.8 24.2 51 3 0
2020 34.4 31.2 65 0 0
2019 31.3 23.6 54 3 0
2018 36.0 25.4 60 11 1
2017 23.1 21.2 35 1 0
2016 15.9 11.8 27 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · PA · Bridgeport

2,322 Garbage collection services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 11 employers in Bridgeport, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shank Waste Service Inc. 29.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Capitol Waste Services Inc. 29.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Affinity Waste Solutions 28.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recology San Mateo County 28.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warminster Service Building 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dillsburg 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dean Dairy - Sharpsville 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE E00610-Pepperidge Farm Downingtown 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ZKOP 587 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Bridgeport 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR 194 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR League Collegiate Wear, LLC 174 FTE
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE XCO 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Falkner Farms 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Visioneering, Inc - Auburn Hills 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enterprise 54A1 229 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.