Electric power distribution systems · Indiana

Jackson County Rural Electric

Brownstown, IN · ~79 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jackson County Rural Electric runs at 291% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Jackson County Rural Electric: 3.5 TCR = 291% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jackson County Rural Electric safety composite

Jackson County Rural Electric scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Jackson County Rural Electric injury rate improved

Jackson County Rural Electric's TCR fell 2.0 from 4.8 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Brownstown, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.5 · 291% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #59/87
  • PHOTO Service Center
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Jackson County Rural Electric in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jackson County Rural Electric averages 3.5 TCR (291% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jackson County Rural Electric TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 1.2

Where Jackson County Rural Electric falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 87 Electric power distribution sy employers in Indiana.

Jackson County Rural Electric (79 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jackson County Rural Electric
Jackson County Rural Electric (79 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Jackson County Rural Electric has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2023 4.1 0.0 3 0 0
2022 2.7 0.0 1 1 0
2021 1.3 0.0 0 1 0
2020 2.8 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 5.5 4.2 4 0 0
2017 4.7 3.1 3 0 0
2016 4.8 1.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · IN · Brownstown

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 7 employers in Brownstown, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Service Center 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pine Belt Division Office 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carroll EMC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carroll Electric - Berryville 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE IWP, Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kokomo 05 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biancofiori 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flexible Materials Inc 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOOSIER CHRISTIAN VILLAGE 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR E&H Tubing, Inc. 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trimpe 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR 024-00053 57 FTE
NAT-TCR ID Technology-New Freedom 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fresh Mark Cold Storage 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Riverside Machine & Engineering 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR IAS Monticello 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE CIT Trucks - Mokena 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Manufacturing, Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookside Elementary School 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Woodwork 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.