Nursing homes · Indiana

The Springs at Lafayette

Lafayette, IN · ~79 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Springs at Lafayette runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade F.

The Springs at Lafayette: 15.1 TCR = 232% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Springs at Lafayette safety composite

The Springs at Lafayette scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Springs at Lafayette held a steady TCR band

The Springs at Lafayette's TCR held near 0.1 from 10.9 in 2016 to 10.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 34.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.9 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=16.9 · 2020=34.2 · 2021=22.0 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=12.2 · 2024=10.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Lafayette, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 232% of ind

  • DART 10.8 DART
  • RANK #603/640
  • PHOTO AUTUMN CARE OF STATE…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AUTUMN CARE OF STATESVILLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

The Springs at Lafayette in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Springs at Lafayette averages 15.1 TCR (232% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Springs at Lafayette TCR series: 2016=10.9 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=16.9 · 2020=34.2 · 2021=22 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=12.2 · 2024=10.8 · BLS 6.5

Where The Springs at Lafayette falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #603 safest of 640 Nursing homes employers in Indiana.

The Springs at Lafayette (79 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Springs at Lafayette
The Springs at Lafayette (79 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Springs at Lafayette has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.8 10.8 7 0 0
2023 12.2 12.2 8 0 0
2022 12.7 11.3 8 1 0
2021 22.0 20.3 10 3 0
2020 34.2 30.9 6 15 0
2019 16.9 16.9 11 0 0
2018 10.2 7.3 7 0 0
2017 5.5 4.1 4 0 0
2016 10.9 3.6 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IN · Lafayette

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 205 employers in Lafayette, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AUTUMN CARE OF STATESVILLE 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford Health Care Center 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solaris Healthcare Windermere 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Gardens Conv Hosp Los Angeles 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jackson County Rural Electric 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE IWP, Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kokomo 05 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biancofiori 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. 6,222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lafayette Operations 3,025 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wabash Lafayette North 2,452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arnett Hospital 2,070 FTE
NAT-TCR Pine Tree Waste - Scarborough 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Challenger Harvest, Inc. 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Southampton,PA 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Girard Wood Products Orting 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE G.L. Wilson Building Company 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Electric Cooperative, Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE JJ Taylor Companies Inc. - Fort Pierce 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeSesa Engineering Company, Inc 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.