Coating metals and metal products for the trade · Michigan

Jackson Tumble Finish

Jackson, MI · ~116 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jackson Tumble Finish runs at 282% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Jackson Tumble Finish: 9.3 TCR = 282% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jackson Tumble Finish safety composite

Jackson Tumble Finish scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2016→2023

Jackson Tumble Finish injury rate improved

Jackson Tumble Finish's TCR fell 3.9 from 9.1 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 19.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.1 · 2018=12.0 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=19.8 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Jackson, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 282% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #40/47
  • PHOTO Acme Galvanizing, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Acme Galvanizing, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Jackson Tumble Finish in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jackson Tumble Finish averages 9.3 TCR (282% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jackson Tumble Finish TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2018=12 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=19.8 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Jackson Tumble Finish falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 47 Coating metals and metal produ employers in Michigan.

Jackson Tumble Finish (116 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jackson Tumble Finish
Jackson Tumble Finish (116 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Jackson Tumble Finish has more employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.2 0.0 3 0 0
2022 5.7 1.9 3 0 0
2021 19.8 11.0 9 0 0
2020 7.4 1.9 4 0 0
2019 6.1 0.0 4 0 0
2018 12.0 3.4 7 0 0
2016 9.1 2.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · MI · Jackson

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 207 employers in Jackson, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Acme Galvanizing, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Canfield Coating LLC 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR AZZ Crowley Powder Coat 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Coatings Inc. 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad Electronics, Inc. 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louisiana-Pacific Newberry 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4650 Brownstown MI 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Traverse Container-GR 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allegiance Health 4,779 FTE
CITY-NEAR Main Hospital Campus 3,076 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford Jackson 2,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford- Jackson Downtown Campus 1,201 FTE
NAT-TCR Bay Crest Care Center 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 610-Asm-Asm - Sterling 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Highlands Lake Center 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR American Aluminum Extrusion (Canton OH) 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rohrer Corporation - Addison Facility 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Akron - Eastwood Shop 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE NASG Seating Bryan, LLC 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rohrer Corporation - Bensenville Facility 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.