Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · Georgia

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI

Johns Creek, GA · ~23 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade A.

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI: 0.6 TCR = 48% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI safety composite

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2024

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI injury rate improved

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Johns Creek, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/22
  • PHOTO Jacobs - Key West - …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jacobs - Key West - OMI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI averages 0.6 TCR (48% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 22 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in Georgia.

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI (23 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI
Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI (23 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Jacobs - JOHNS CREEK - OMI has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · GA · Johns Creek

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 31 employers in Johns Creek, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jacobs - Key West - OMI 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office Building 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanitation District No. 1 - Main Office 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plaquemines Parish 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canon Pullet 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clermont Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROSSMAN APIARIES LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcon JCM 1,596 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcon Johns Creek Manufacturing 1,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Johns Creek Hospital -6325 EHC 1,363 FTE
CITY-NEAR Macy's Systems and Technology - MAIN OFFICE 1,131 FTE
NAT-TCR CA159 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Palm Beach 17th St E (1217) 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Clearwater Tampa Rd (1376) 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Church Farm School 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wesley Wilcox Finishing 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Louisville 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wyoming Block 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE SA Recycling Los Angeles, E. 15th St 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.