Construction management, multifamily building · Washington

James E John Construction Co., Inc.

Vancouver, WA · ~43 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

James E John Construction Co., Inc. runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Construction management, multifamily building workplace, earning a grade D.

James E John Construction Co., Inc.: 4.6 TCR = 120% of Construction management, multifamily building BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

James E John Construction Co., Inc. safety composite

James E John Construction Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

James E John Construction Co., Inc.: 2.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 12.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

James E John Construction Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 0.7 from 2.0 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 12.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236116 · Vancouver, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/20
  • PHOTO Marr Development
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marr Development (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

James E John Construction Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows James E John Construction Co., Inc. averages 4.6 TCR (120% of the Construction management, multifamily building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

James E John Construction Co., Inc. TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=4.2 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.8

Where James E John Construction Co., Inc. falls in its industry

410 Construction management, multi establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 20 Construction management, multi employers in Washington.

James E John Construction Co., Inc. (43 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate James E John Construction Co., Inc.
James E John Construction Co., Inc. (43 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6

James E John Construction Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Construction management, multifamily bui median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 12.7 2.5 2 3 0
2021 5.5 2.8 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.3 6.2 3 0 0
2018 4.2 2.1 2 0 0
2017 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236116 · WA · Vancouver

410 Construction management, multifamily building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 490 employers in Vancouver, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marr Development 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westport Construction Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hankin Group 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Restore Construction Group, Inc. 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE ML Taggares Inc dba Arete Vineyards 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrews Vineyards 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trout Lake Farm East Farm 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pe Ell 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorn Senior Living 3,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwest Medical Center Main Campus 3,464 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-PL600 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR 600 1,922 FTE
NAT-TCR USA Portland OR 9555 NE Airport Way 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Polypeptide Laboratories 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kelleher Construction, Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Carman Industries 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knud Nielsen Company, Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux Falls Regional Airport 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Solenis LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rainy Day Roofing Inc. 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.