Apartment building construction general contractors · Florida

Restore Construction Group, Inc.

West Park, FL · ~232 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Restore Construction Group, Inc. runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Apartment building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Restore Construction Group, Inc.: 4.7 TCR = 123% of Apartment building construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Restore Construction Group, Inc. safety composite

Restore Construction Group, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Restore Construction Group, Inc.: 4.3 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 9.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2021

Restore Construction Group, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.9 from 4.3 in 2017 to 9.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236116 · West Park, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 123% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #31/33
  • PHOTO Hankin Group
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~232 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hankin Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Restore Construction Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Restore Construction Group, Inc. averages 4.7 TCR (123% of the Apartment building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Restore Construction Group, Inc. TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Restore Construction Group, Inc. falls in its industry

410 Apartment building constructio establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 33 Apartment building constructio employers in Florida.

Restore Construction Group, Inc. (232 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Restore Construction Group, Inc.
Restore Construction Group, Inc. (232 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Restore Construction Group, Inc. has more employees than the Apartment building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.2 6.0 20 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.2 2.7 15 1 0
2018 2.7 2.7 5 0 0
2017 4.3 1.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236116 · FL · West Park

410 Apartment building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 7 employers in West Park, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hankin Group 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westport Construction Inc. 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR endvrcorp dba Aspire Builders 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR James E John Construction Co., Inc. 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Restore Construction Group, Inc. 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Bend Power Station 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kraft Heinz Food Company 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE Winter Haven Facility 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0285 HOLLYWOOD 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR XpressGuards LLC 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southeast Duct Specialist, Inc 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cherry Roofing Enterprises, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-TCR Compagnon Incorporated 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutter Lakeside Hospital (274-SL-HSP) 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Insul-Therm Sacramento 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shenandoah Main Production and Office Facility 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lettuce 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heska Corporation 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woeber Mustard 232 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.