Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Texas

Jamesplc 1

Boerne, TX · ~178 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jamesplc 1 runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Jamesplc 1: 1.0 TCR = 36% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jamesplc 1 safety composite

Jamesplc 1 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

Jamesplc 1 injury rate improved

Jamesplc 1's TCR fell 2.7 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Boerne, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #59/161
  • PHOTO Hydaker-Wheatlake - …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~178 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hydaker-Wheatlake - Michigan Statewide (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Jamesplc 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jamesplc 1 averages 1.0 TCR (36% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jamesplc 1 TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Jamesplc 1 falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 161 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Texas.

Jamesplc 1 (178 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jamesplc 1
Jamesplc 1 (178 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Jamesplc 1 has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 3 0 0
2021 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.2 1.6 4 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.1 2.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · TX · Boerne

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 61 employers in Boerne, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hydaker-Wheatlake - Michigan Statewide 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Campamento Gurabo 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royers 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kinetik 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mundy Maintenance and Services LLC Job #31041 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apres Management, Inc. 178 FTE
STATE-SIZE OIS-Port Arthur 178 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1126 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1126 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boerne Facility 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR AEC BOE OPS 223 FTE
NAT-TCR Allnex USA Inc. - Willow Island 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pwr LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Monroe Township High School 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgan Advanced Ceramics, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Albert M. Higley Co. 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE R+L Carriers - LVE 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE 165-Phoenix Marriott at Tempe, the Buttes Resort 178 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alphapointe - New York 178 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.