Construction management, power and communication transmission line · Michigan

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI

Reed City, MI · ~260 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, power and communication transmission line workplace, earning a grade A.

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI: 1.0 TCR = 36% of Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI safety composite

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2021

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI injury rate improved

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.1 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.1 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Reed City, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 36% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #20/54
  • PHOTO Jamesplc 1
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~260 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jamesplc 1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI averages 1.0 TCR (36% of the Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI falls in its industry

1,605 Construction management, power establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 54 Construction management, power employers in Michigan.

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI (260 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI
Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI (260 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Hydaker-Wheatlake Statewide 876 MI has more employees than the Construction management, power and commu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.6 0.6 2 1 0
2020 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2019 1.6 1.2 4 0 0
2018 1.3 0.0 3 0 0
2017 1.1 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MI · Reed City

1,605 Construction management, power and communication transmission line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 32 employers in Reed City, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jamesplc 1 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hydaker-Wheatlake - Michigan Statewide 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Campamento Gurabo 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royers 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE FAYGO BEVERAGES INC 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ice Mountain - NWNA 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Signs365.com 260 FTE
STATE-SIZE Creative Foam 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR Utility Supply & Construction Company - ALL 1,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hydaker-Wheatlake Company 821 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Mills Yoplait Reed City 413 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPECTRUM HEALTH - REED CITY 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Des Plaines Campus 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pi-Co Precision Fabrication 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stratford, The 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CTS Tampa 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca-Wesley Med Ctr Evs 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE 331260-Camden Po 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cenveo Worldwide Limited Eureka 260 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covington Distribution Center 260 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.