Razors, electric, manufacturing · Tennessee

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane

Mcminnville, TN · ~233 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Razors, electric, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Razors, electric, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane safety composite

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2016→2021

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane injury rate improved

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane's TCR fell 3.2 from 4.6 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335210 · Mcminnville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Lasko Products LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~233 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lasko Products LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Razors, electric, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane falls in its industry

50 Razors, electric, manufacturin establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Razors, electric, manufacturin employers in Tennessee.

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane (233 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane
Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane (233 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Jarden Consumer Solutions - Cadillac Lane has more employees than the Razors, electric, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.4 0.9 3 0 0
2020 2.6 1.0 3 2 0
2019 1.8 0.6 3 0 0
2018 3.9 1.9 7 1 0
2017 1.2 0.8 2 1 0
2016 4.6 1.5 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335210 · TN · Mcminnville

50 Razors, electric, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 40 employers in Mcminnville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lasko Products LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lasko Products LLC PA 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lasko Products LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metal Ware 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jake Marshall LLC 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE 025-00402 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE 026-00569 233 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trans-Carriers, INC. 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren County - All School Employees (Excluding Food Service) 1,085 FTE
CITY-NEAR Warren County - All County Executive Employees (Excluding Highway Dept) 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 668 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR 668 339 FTE
NAT-TCR Superior Landscaping & Lawn Service Inc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Unique Thirft Store-121acre 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Camp Creek 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wild Waves Holdings LLC 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Good Samaritan Society Pohai Nani 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Multi-Color Corporation - York 233 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baywater Drilling, LLC 233 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.