General-line scrap merchant wholesalers · Texas

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc.

Lubbock, TX · ~59 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. runs at 346% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General-line scrap merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc.: 7.6 TCR = 346% of General-line scrap merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. safety composite

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2019→2024

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. injury rate improved

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc.'s TCR fell 2.7 from 11.5 in 2019 to 8.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=11.5 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=9.2 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423930 · Lubbock, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 346% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #85/101
  • PHOTO Lastique Internation…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lastique International Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. averages 7.6 TCR (346% of the General-line scrap merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. TCR series: 2019=11.5 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=8.7 · 2022=9.2 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 2.2

Where Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. falls in its industry

1,126 General-line scrap merchant wh establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #85 safest of 101 General-line scrap merchant wh employers in Texas.

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. (59 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc.
Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. (59 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Jarvis Metals Recycling Inc. has more employees than the General-line scrap merchant wholesalers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 7.3 6 0 0
2023 4.5 4.5 3 0 0
2022 9.2 7.6 6 0 0
2021 8.7 8.7 6 0 0
2020 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2019 11.5 10.0 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423930 · TX · Lubbock

1,126 General-line scrap merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 482 employers in Lubbock, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lastique International Corporation 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Savannah Pallets and Recycling 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berman Bros. Iron & Metal Co., Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Auto Recycling Center 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Omega Protein INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Plainview SPSC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Beckville Mine 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRG - T.H. Wharton 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR A01 Covenant Medical Center 3,178 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-20049000 2,269 FTE
CITY-NEAR FALCON HEALTHCARE INC DBA INTERIM HEALTHCARE 2,046 FTE
CITY-NEAR Covenant Health System 1,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Noah Homes, Inc 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lastique International Corporation 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 10244 Northbrook 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 10327 Tanasbourne 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martins Distribution Center 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE 122-AURORA 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAF Atlanta 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-15913 Mountain Ave. 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.