Facilities (except computer operation) support services · New Jersey

JBMDL Facilities Support Services

Fort Dix, NJ · ~118 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JBMDL Facilities Support Services runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Facilities (except computer operation) support services workplace, earning a grade D.

JBMDL Facilities Support Services: 4.7 TCR = 182% of Facilities (except computer operation) support services BLS 2.6 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JBMDL Facilities Support Services safety composite

JBMDL Facilities Support Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2022

JBMDL Facilities Support Services injury rate improved

JBMDL Facilities Support Services's TCR fell 5.0 from 6.2 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Fort Dix, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 182% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #8/13
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT BLYTHEDALE…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT BLYTHEDALE CHILDRENS HOSP POM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

JBMDL Facilities Support Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JBMDL Facilities Support Services averages 4.7 TCR (182% of the Facilities (except computer operation) support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JBMDL Facilities Support Services TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=6.3 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=2 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.1 · BLS 2.6

Where JBMDL Facilities Support Services falls in its industry

757 Facilities (except computer op establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 13 Facilities (except computer op employers in New Jersey.

JBMDL Facilities Support Services (118 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate JBMDL Facilities Support Services
JBMDL Facilities Support Services (118 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

JBMDL Facilities Support Services has more employees than the Facilities (except computer operation) s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 2 0 0
2019 12.3 12.3 1 0 0
2018 6.3 4.2 6 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2016 6.2 6.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · NJ · Fort Dix

757 Facilities (except computer operation) support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT BLYTHEDALE CHILDRENS HOSP POM 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300858600 - BSWH BUMC EVS 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LOT Management 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT MARIAN UNIVERSITY FACILITIES 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE EGM Builders 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE NJRHS - Wall 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips 66 Bayway Linden NJ - BIS 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4over International LLC - NJ State 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wrightstown 117 FTE
NAT-TCR 0248 - Montgomeryville Pa Whse 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 0140 - Kona Hi Whse 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR JFK-SPUSA 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR McDonald's 18637 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZTER 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZOAL 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHS - Interlude Fridley 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Regent Bellevue 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.