Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) · Illinois

JCG Industries Inc

Chicago, IL · ~1,514 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JCG Industries Inc runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) workplace, earning a grade A.

JCG Industries Inc: 0.1 TCR = 2% of Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JCG Industries Inc safety composite

JCG Industries Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

85/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−50.4

2018→2020

JCG Industries Inc injury rate improved

JCG Industries Inc's TCR fell 50.4 from 50.4 in 2018 to 0.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 50.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=50.4 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Corporate Office
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~1,514 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corporate Office (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

JCG Industries Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JCG Industries Inc averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JCG Industries Inc TCR series: 2018=50.4 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.1 · BLS 3.3

Where JCG Industries Inc falls in its industry

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, f establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Chickens, processing, fresh, f employers in Illinois.

JCG Industries Inc (1,514 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate JCG Industries Inc
JCG Industries Inc (1,514 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

JCG Industries Inc has more employees than the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, can median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.1 0.0 21 10 0
2019 0.1 0.1 26 6 0
2018 50.4 33.6 16 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · IL · Chicago

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corporate Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goldsboro Plant 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manda - Baton Rouge 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crescent Duck Farm, Inc. 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - MDW5 1,509 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur Public School District No. 61 1,524 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAC Corporate 1,530 FTE
STATE-SIZE IL Dept. of Revenue 1,498 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR ExxonMobil Global Services Company Houston Campus 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Eden Prairie Hq Mn 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NM-01 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Wilmington Facility) 1,514 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Dow Chemical Company - Louisiana Operations 1,514 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond MC - PMUSA 1,514 FTE
NAT-SIZE 284219-Kcmo Mo P&Dc 1,513 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.