Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire · Texas

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North

Sugar Land, TX · ~465 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North runs at 2% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire workplace, earning a grade A.

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North: 0.1 TCR = 2% of Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North safety composite

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North held a steady TCR band

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.2 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · Sugar Land, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 2% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO General Cable Highla…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~465 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: General Cable Highland Heights (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North averages 0.1 TCR (2% of the Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North falls in its industry

144 Communications wire and cable, establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Communications wire and cable, employers in Texas.

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North (465 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North
Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North (465 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Schlumberger Sugar Land Campus North has more employees than the Communications wire and cable, nonferrou median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · TX · Sugar Land

144 Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 147 employers in Sugar Land, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR General Cable Highland Heights 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interstate Wire Company 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Virtual Employees 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Times Microwave Systems West 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Solar 465 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10DE016 PHARMA NATIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE CTR 465 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Foods Dallas 465 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sliver Eagle Distributors, L.P. - San Antonio 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED 77,810 FTE
CITY-NEAR TEAM Industrial Services, Inc 5,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schlumberger Sugar Land South 1,934 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Residential, Inc. 1,931 FTE
NAT-TCR JCG Industries Inc 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Staff Offices 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Joseph Community Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Eden Prairie Hq Mn 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Turner at Citgo Petroleum Lake Charles LA 465 FTE
NAT-SIZE CSP - Salisbury 465 FTE
NAT-SIZE WKW Erbsloeh North America, LLC 465 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oklahoma Surgical Hospital 465 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.