Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers · North Carolina

JCI Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~19 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JCI Charlotte runs at 161% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade D.

JCI Charlotte: 3.5 TCR = 161% of Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JCI Charlotte safety composite

JCI Charlotte scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 15.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

JCI Charlotte: 5.4 → 15.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.5 TCR · DART/TCR 4.36× in 2024

JCI Charlotte's TCR rose 10.1 from 5.4 in 2016 to 15.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 4.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.5 · 161% of ind

  • DART 15.5 DART
  • RANK #18/22
  • PHOTO Longview
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Longview (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

JCI Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JCI Charlotte averages 3.5 TCR (161% of the Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JCI Charlotte TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=15.5 · BLS 2.2

Where JCI Charlotte falls in its industry

766 Chemicals (except agriculture) establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 22 Chemicals (except agriculture) employers in North Carolina.

JCI Charlotte (19 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate JCI Charlotte
JCI Charlotte (19 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

JCI Charlotte has fewer employees than the Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., au median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.5 15.5 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.7 5.7 1 0 0
2016 5.4 5.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · NC · Charlotte

766 Chemicals (except agriculture) (e.g., automotive, household, industrial, photographic) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Longview 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Refrigerants Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Producers Chemical Company 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turf Today Inc. 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE A And A Farms, Inc. 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod USA - Leggett Sod Farm 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Custom Shutters, INC 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Synergy Flavors (OH), LLC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR R+L Carriers - BNC 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Baptist Village J Olan Jones Center 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crystal Window & Door Systems, Ltd - New York 3.5 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.