Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying · Ohio

J.Daniel & Company

Loveland, OH · ~84 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J.Daniel & Company runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying workplace, earning a grade C.

J.Daniel & Company: 2.7 TCR = 96% of Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J.Daniel & Company safety composite

J.Daniel & Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2016→2024

J.Daniel & Company injury rate improved

J.Daniel & Company's TCR fell 6.5 from 7.9 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.9 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Loveland, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/37
  • PHOTO Pike Maryland Statew…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pike Maryland Statewide Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

J.Daniel & Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J.Daniel & Company averages 2.7 TCR (96% of the Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J.Daniel & Company TCR series: 2016=7.9 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.7 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where J.Daniel & Company falls in its industry

1,605 Underground cable (e.g., cable establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 37 Underground cable (e.g., cable employers in Ohio.

J.Daniel & Company (84 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate J.Daniel & Company
J.Daniel & Company (84 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

J.Daniel & Company has more employees than the Underground cable (e.g., cable televisio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.7 2.5 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 2.4 2 0 0
2019 3.8 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 2.9 1.9 3 0 0
2016 7.9 5.5 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · OH · Loveland

1,605 Underground cable (e.g., cable television, electricity, telephone) laying employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 50 employers in Loveland, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pike Maryland Statewide Operations 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 18300A 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-NJ-Egg Harbor Township-W Parkway Drive 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR KMM Telecommunications 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Phillips Companies 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Mound Street Service Center 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEM Industrial Inc. - Husky Energy, Lima 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bruns Building and Development and Ohio and Indiana Roofing 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Field Sales Central 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMS Construction Inc 252 FTE
CITY-NEAR 014-00435 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer Store 150 205 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Pet - Dallas 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0009 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ned Stevens Gutter Cleaning and General Contracting 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #68 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Modesto 257 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago PDC 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas PDC 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE 58CR 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.