Construction management, power and communication transmission line · North Carolina

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations

Mount Airy, NC · ~19 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Construction management, power and communication transmission line workplace, earning a grade C.

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations: 2.7 TCR = 96% of Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations safety composite

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2016→2024

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations injury rate improved

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations's TCR fell 6.5 from 6.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.5 · 2017=3.3 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Mount Airy, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #49/79
  • PHOTO J.Daniel & Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~19 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J.Daniel & Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pike Maryland Statewide Operations averages 2.7 TCR (96% of the Construction management, power and communication transmission line BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=3.3 · 2019=11.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Pike Maryland Statewide Operations falls in its industry

1,605 Construction management, power establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 79 Construction management, power employers in North Carolina.

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations (19 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pike Maryland Statewide Operations
Pike Maryland Statewide Operations (19 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Pike Maryland Statewide Operations has fewer employees than the Construction management, power and commu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.9 5.9 2 0 0
2017 3.3 2.2 3 0 0
2016 6.5 6.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · NC · Mount Airy

1,605 Construction management, power and communication transmission line employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 94 employers in Mount Airy, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J.Daniel & Company 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 18300A 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NA-US-NJ-Egg Harbor Township-W Parkway Drive 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR KMM Telecommunications 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Turf Today Inc. 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE A And A Farms, Inc. 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buy Sod USA - Leggett Sod Farm 19 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Custom Shutters, INC 19 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike Florida Statewide Operations 1,583 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike North Carolina Statewide Operations 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike Georgia Statewide Operations 969 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike Texas Statewide Operations 738 FTE
NAT-TCR Diversicare of Martin 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockford Spring Company 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 3087 Keystone 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitts Enterprises, Inc. DBA Pitts Trailers 2.7 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.