Automobile dealers, new only or new and used · Minnesota

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto

Roseville, MN · ~75 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Automobile dealers, new only or new and used workplace, earning a grade C.

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto: 3.7 TCR = 110% of Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS 3.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto safety composite

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto: 0.0 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2024

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto's TCR rose 4.8 from 0.0 in 2021 to 4.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441110 · Roseville, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 110% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #113/240
  • PHOTO Walser Hyundai
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walser Hyundai (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto averages 3.7 TCR (110% of the Automobile dealers, new only or new and used BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 3.4

Where Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto falls in its industry

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only o establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #113 safest of 240 Automobile dealers, new only o employers in Minnesota.

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto (75 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto
Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto (75 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Jeff Belzer's Roseville Auto has more employees than the Automobile dealers, new only or new and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 3.2 3 0 0
2023 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2022 7.5 5.6 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441110 · MN · Roseville

2,847 Automobile dealers, new only or new and used employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walser Hyundai 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAVE KRING CHEVROLET, INC. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTHGATE FORD INC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUBARU OF MOON TOWNSHIP 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crossroad Construction, Inc. 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE BCI Construction, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Asphalt Services, LLC 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE M. G. McGrath, Inc. Glass & Glazing 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR John Evans' Sons, Incorporated 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Radial - Easton 1 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hamlet Assisted Living Operator LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR D&T Excavation, Inc 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 30415 - Super Store Ind Lathrop CA 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Supply - Chester Yard 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE East Side Jersey Dairy - Sioux Falls Operations 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Candler Hotel 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.