General medical and surgical hospitals · Pennsylvania

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard

Phila, PA · ~49 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General medical and surgical hospitals workplace, earning a grade D.

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard: 10.7 TCR = 143% of General medical and surgical hospitals BLS 7.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard safety composite

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard: 5.5 → 18.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2024

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard's TCR rose 12.8 from 5.5 in 2021 to 18.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Phila, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 10.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #253/262
  • PHOTO PAM Rehab of Tulsa
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PAM Rehab of Tulsa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard averages 10.7 TCR (143% of the General medical and surgical hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard TCR series: 2021=5.5 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=10.3 · 2024=18.3 · BLS 7.5

Where Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard falls in its industry

6,862 General medical and surgical h establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #253 safest of 262 General medical and surgical h employers in Pennsylvania.

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard (49 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard
Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard (49 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard has fewer employees than the General medical and surgical hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.3 6.9 8 0 0
2023 10.3 0.0 4 0 0
2022 8.7 0.0 3 0 0
2021 5.5 2.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · PA · Phila

6,862 General medical and surgical hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 8 employers in Phila, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PAM Rehab of Tulsa 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TriHealth Evendale Hospital 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nazareth Hospital 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vidant SurgiCenter 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bonnie Brae Fruit Farms, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & L Orchard Co. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vallorani Mushrooms 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Story of PA- Smithfield (AWH) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gift of Life Donor Program 294 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bala Nursing Center 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR Newman & Company 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR United State Recycling, Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-TCR The Enclave of Franklin 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Better Logistics Inc. 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HP Hood- Portland 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Forest Wood Products LLC 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Powell 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C693 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of White Hall 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake Harriet Lower 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.