Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing · Maine

HP Hood- Portland

Portland, ME · ~140 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HP Hood- Portland runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

HP Hood- Portland: 10.7 TCR = 324% of Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HP Hood- Portland safety composite

HP Hood- Portland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2017→2024

HP Hood- Portland injury rate improved

HP Hood- Portland's TCR fell 3.8 from 15.0 in 2017 to 11.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 15.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.0 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=15.6 · 2024=11.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311511 · Portland, ME ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 324% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK P8
  • PHOTO HP HOOD LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 116 inj
  • SIZE ~140 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HP HOOD LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

HP Hood- Portland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HP Hood- Portland averages 10.7 TCR (324% of the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HP Hood- Portland TCR series: 2017=15 · 2018=8 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=15.2 · 2023=15.6 · 2024=11.1 · BLS 3.3

Where HP Hood- Portland falls in its industry

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottlin establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
HP Hood- Portland (140 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HP Hood- Portland
HP Hood- Portland (140 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 140 employees and a TCR of 4.5

HP Hood- Portland has more employees than the Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.1 8.8 13 1 0
2023 15.6 14.1 20 0 0
2022 15.2 11.4 19 1 0
2021 7.3 6.6 10 0 0
2020 7.1 7.1 10 0 0
2019 6.2 6.2 9 0 0
2018 8.0 6.0 12 0 0
2017 15.0 13.7 23 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311511 · ME · Portland

457 Milk processing (e.g., bottling, homogenizing, pasteurizing, vitaminizing) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 244 employers in Portland, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HP HOOD LLC 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Umpqua Dairy Products Roseburg 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LIFEWAY WISCONSIN, INC 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ehrmann Commonwealth Dairy 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pride Manufacturing Company, LLC 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pottle's Transportation, LLC Hermon Terminal 140 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCB, Inc. 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaBree's Bakery 141 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC 8,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC- 22 Bram 5,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Portland 4,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMP Practices 2,063 FTE
NAT-TCR Triangle Electric 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jefferson Surgical Center at the Navy Yard 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Wolf Creek Ski Area 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 2004 - City of Industry 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brian House Inc 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carbondale Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mare Island Dry Dock 140 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barbourville Health & Rehabilitation Center 140 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.