Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing · Tennessee

Jet-Fab Inc

Cookeville, TN · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jet-Fab Inc runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Jet-Fab Inc: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jet-Fab Inc safety composite

Jet-Fab Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2016→2023

Jet-Fab Inc injury rate improved

Jet-Fab Inc's TCR fell 3.5 from 8.8 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.8 · 2017=10.0 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=10.6 · 2023=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Cookeville, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Langley Wire Cloth C…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Jet-Fab Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jet-Fab Inc averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jet-Fab Inc TCR series: 2016=8.8 · 2017=10 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=10.6 · 2023=5.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Jet-Fab Inc falls in its industry

391 Presses (e.g., bending, punchi establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Presses (e.g., bending, punchi employers in Tennessee.

Jet-Fab Inc (25 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Jet-Fab Inc
Jet-Fab Inc (25 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Jet-Fab Inc has fewer employees than the Presses (e.g., bending, punching, sheari median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 10.6 10.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.9 8.9 2 0 0
2017 10.0 5.0 2 0 0
2016 8.8 4.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · TN · Cookeville

391 Presses (e.g., bending, punching, shearing, stamping), metal forming, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 135 employers in Cookeville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reed City Group Life Sciences and Medical, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NuAir 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deringer Ney Inc 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE B&B Sawmill, LLC 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Union City UCY1 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE UCEMC Corporate 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8018168 - Nashville Federal Courthouse 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSC -COPORATE SERVICE CENTER 974 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cookeville CSC 908 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cookeville CKV 4 855 FTE
CITY-NEAR PUTNAM COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENT 773 FTE
NAT-TCR Trivector Manufacturing 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ventra Grand Rapids 29 LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ACGC Junior/Senior High 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ridge Area Arc, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE BT Fresno 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brownmiller Leasing & Transportation Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keller-Martin Construction, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michael A. Ferrauilo Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.