Machine tools, metal forming, manufacturing · Tennessee

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc.

Adamsville, TN · ~54 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Machine tools, metal forming, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc.: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Machine tools, metal forming, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. safety composite

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2020

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. injury rate improved

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.0 from 9.0 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Adamsville, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Jet-Fab Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jet-Fab Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Machine tools, metal forming, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=6.8 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. falls in its industry

391 Machine tools, metal forming, establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Machine tools, metal forming, employers in Tennessee.

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. (54 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc.
Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. (54 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Langley Wire Cloth Components, Inc. has fewer employees than the Machine tools, metal forming, manufactur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.1 0.0 1 3 0
2019 4.6 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 0 1 0
2017 6.8 6.8 4 0 0
2016 9.0 2.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · TN · Adamsville

391 Machine tools, metal forming, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 4 employers in Adamsville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jet-Fab Inc 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reed City Group Life Sciences and Medical, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NuAir 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deringer Ney Inc 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sweetwater Utilities Board 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE CEMC-Clarksville Annex 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE McIntosh 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROBERTSON CO - CNR274 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR RIPLEY INDUSTRIES, INC./ADAMSVILLE 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ripley Industries, Inc. - Adamsville 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR JONES EXHAUST SYSTEMS 36 FTE
NAT-TCR 171 Victorville 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Brewing 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Candlelight Cabinetry, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Family Medicine/ Pediatric Clinic 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Praxair Distribution Inc. North Royalton 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Just $ave #137 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 902 South Clack Street 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 517 Arlington Blvd 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.