Homes for the aged with nursing care · Pennsylvania

Jewish Association on Aging

Pittsburgh, PA · ~308 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jewish Association on Aging runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

Jewish Association on Aging: 6.9 TCR = 107% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jewish Association on Aging safety composite

Jewish Association on Aging scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2017→2024

Jewish Association on Aging injury rate improved

Jewish Association on Aging's TCR fell 5.2 from 8.5 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.5 · 2018=8.9 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.9 · 107% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #341/754
  • PHOTO Windsor Atrium
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~308 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windsor Atrium (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Jewish Association on Aging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jewish Association on Aging averages 6.9 TCR (107% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jewish Association on Aging TCR series: 2017=8.5 · 2018=8.9 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Jewish Association on Aging falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #341 safest of 754 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in Pennsylvania.

Jewish Association on Aging (308 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jewish Association on Aging
Jewish Association on Aging (308 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Jewish Association on Aging has more employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2018 8.9 3.4 31 1 0
2017 8.5 5.8 31 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · PA · Pittsburgh

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windsor Atrium 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oregon Living & Rehabilitation Center, LLC 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burlington Medical Investors LLC dba Life Care Center of Burlington 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marquis Wilsonville 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bridge and Decking Constrution 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA - Aspers - 45 Aspers North Rd - Mott's LLP 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allentown East (305) 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE Work & Outdoor Group Division 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Monschein Industries, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Steam Service Headquarters 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard San Antonio 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR C282 Baltimore PC 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Concrete Frame Associates : Concrete Frame Associates 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE S05349 - WM of Illinois Missouri Valley Area Office 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shop Rite of Rio Grande 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yamato Transport U.S.A., Inc. 308 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.