Electric power generation, hydroelectric · Wisconsin

Steam Service Headquarters

Milwaukee, WI · ~27 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Steam Service Headquarters runs at 578% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade F.

Steam Service Headquarters: 6.9 TCR = 578% of Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Steam Service Headquarters safety composite

Steam Service Headquarters scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Steam Service Headquarters held a steady TCR band

Steam Service Headquarters's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 29.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=29.2 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 578% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Industrial Building …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Industrial Building #5 (Location) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Steam Service Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Steam Service Headquarters averages 6.9 TCR (578% of the Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Steam Service Headquarters TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=7.2 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=29.2 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Steam Service Headquarters falls in its industry

129 Electric power generation, hyd establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Electric power generation, hyd employers in Wisconsin.

Steam Service Headquarters (27 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Steam Service Headquarters
Steam Service Headquarters (27 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Steam Service Headquarters has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, hydroelectric median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2020 29.2 25.0 7 0 0
2019 9.7 0.0 3 0 0
2018 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2017 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · WI · Milwaukee

129 Electric power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Industrial Building #5 (Location) 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NYSEG Auburn 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSE, BAK - Baker River Office 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Maintenance (Location) 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lake Mills Corporate Office 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chilton Dairy, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooperative Resources International - Distribution Center 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Croix Electric Cooperative 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Monschein Industries, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Jewish Association on Aging 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard San Antonio 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stericycle - Hollister,CA 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Road Cases USA, Inc. 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mar-Tek Industries, Inc 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scholl Canyon Landfill 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ee Root, LLC 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.