Family social service agencies · Michigan

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc.

Ann Arbor, MI · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Family social service agencies workplace, earning a grade C.

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Family social service agencies BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. safety composite

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624190 · Ann Arbor, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/28
  • PHOTO The People Concern -…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The People Concern - Alexandria (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Family social service agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. falls in its industry

990 Family social service agencies establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 28 Family social service agencies employers in Michigan.

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc.
Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Jewish Family Servies of Washtenaw County, Inc. has fewer employees than the Family social service agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624190 · MI · Ann Arbor

990 Family social service agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 271 employers in Ann Arbor, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The People Concern - Alexandria 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LifeStream Services, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The People Concern - E6 Hollywood 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA of Memphis - Oxford 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nash Greenhouses, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Arrow Dairy 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - BC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Operations and Maintenance 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital-AnnArbor 5,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph Mercy Hospital-Ann Arbor 5,554 FTE
CITY-NEAR IHA Health Services Corporation 2,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thomson Reuters - Ann Arbor 1,090 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Miner Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manheim Keystone Pennsylvania 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davis Core & Pad INC. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.