Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) · Georgia

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC

Kingsland, GA · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) workplace, earning a grade F.

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC: 10.3 TCR = 230% of Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC safety composite

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2016→2018

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC injury rate improved

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC's TCR fell 7.5 from 15.3 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.3 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488310 · Kingsland, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 230% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Ports America Chesap…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ports America Chesapeake - Baltimore Shops (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC averages 10.3 TCR (230% of the Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC TCR series: 2016=15.3 · 2017=7.8 · 2018=7.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC falls in its industry

81 Maintenance services, waterfro establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Maintenance services, waterfro employers in Georgia.

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC (47 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC
Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC (47 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Regional Boat Maintenance Center-RBMC has fewer employees than the Maintenance services, waterfront termina median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 7.8 3.9 3 1 0
2017 7.8 7.8 4 0 0
2016 15.3 6.6 3 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488310 · GA · Kingsland

81 Maintenance services, waterfront terminal (except dredging) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 15 employers in Kingsland, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ports America Chesapeake - Baltimore Shops 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gateway New London, LLC 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR PENN Warehousing & Distribution, Inc. (Auto Division) 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hendricks River Logistics, LLC 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE SS-Harvest South 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens TMC 1004 Boulevard Athens GA 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colquitt Electric Membership Corporation - Valdosta 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Austell Operating - 2525 Old Alabama Rd. Austell 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 0455 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2489 LOWE S OF CAMDEN COUNTY GA 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-2489 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakes Crossing Senior Care 94 FTE
NAT-TCR Potsdam (Nypot) 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EP Mechanical Technologies 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dutchmen Plant 840 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 055370-Newman Po 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Power Magnetics 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE SC420 - Nashville 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE NFSL1 - Salt Lake City UT 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE CG015 - Freetown, MA 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.