Skilled nursing facilities · California

Palm Village Retirement Community

Reedley, CA · ~221 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Palm Village Retirement Community runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Palm Village Retirement Community: 12.1 TCR = 186% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Palm Village Retirement Community safety composite

Palm Village Retirement Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Palm Village Retirement Community: 4.9 → 20.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 348.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2024

Palm Village Retirement Community's TCR rose 15.3 from 4.9 in 2018 to 20.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 348.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Reedley, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 12.1 · 186% of ind

  • DART 7.5 DART
  • RANK #573/739
  • PHOTO J.F. Hawkins Nursing…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 135 inj
  • SIZE ~221 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Palm Village Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Palm Village Retirement Community averages 12.1 TCR (186% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Palm Village Retirement Community TCR series: 2018=4.9 · 2019=7.6 · 2020=15.7 · 2021=348.7 · 2022=13.5 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=20.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Palm Village Retirement Community falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #573 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Palm Village Retirement Community (221 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Palm Village Retirement Community
Palm Village Retirement Community (221 employees, TCR 12.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Palm Village Retirement Community has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.2 7.5 37 1 0
2023 10.6 1.2 18 0 0
2022 13.5 2.4 14 9 0
2021 348.7 31.7 22 0 0
2020 15.7 11.9 25 0 0
2019 7.6 4.9 11 3 0
2018 4.9 2.7 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Reedley

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 60 employers in Reedley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J.F. Hawkins Nursing Home 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brackenville Center 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caraday of Corpus Christi 12.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Care Center 12.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blessed Harvesting, Inc. 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valverde Construction Inc. 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE GGG Demolition Inc 221 FTE
STATE-SIZE BEAUMONT JUICE, INC. 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Medical Center-Reedley 961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Valley Packing 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moonlight Packing Company LLC Field 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR GAR BENNETT LLC 277 FTE
NAT-TCR Runnings of Litchfield 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Centennial QC/PC 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Front Range CO Windows 12.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rpo Lgi 12.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Norbert E. Mitchell Co., Inc. 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE BF Facility 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corning 221 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trojan Battery Company Sandersville 221 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.