Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Pennsylvania

JFC Pathway Hanover

Hanover, PA · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JFC Pathway Hanover runs at 288% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

JFC Pathway Hanover: 10.9 TCR = 288% of Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JFC Pathway Hanover safety composite

JFC Pathway Hanover scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

JFC Pathway Hanover: 0.0 → 21.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 21.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2019

JFC Pathway Hanover's TCR rose 21.9 from 0.0 in 2018 to 21.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Hanover, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 288% of ind

  • DART 10.9 DART
  • RANK #123/145
  • PHOTO The Resource Center …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Resource Center - Foote Avenue B4 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

JFC Pathway Hanover in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JFC Pathway Hanover averages 10.9 TCR (288% of the Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JFC Pathway Hanover TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=21.9 · BLS 3.8

Where JFC Pathway Hanover falls in its industry

1,320 Day care centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #123 safest of 145 Day care centers for disabled employers in Pennsylvania.

JFC Pathway Hanover (21 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate JFC Pathway Hanover
JFC Pathway Hanover (21 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

JFC Pathway Hanover has fewer employees than the Day care centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 21.9 10.9 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · PA · Hanover

1,320 Day care centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 149 employers in Hanover, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Resource Center - Foote Avenue B4 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hatfield Center 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Active Day 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Porter Hills Home Health East 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smiling Porker 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE STgenetics-PA Dairy 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE LUMA, Carolina Hangar 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Frackville 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARTER DOOR & MILLWORK HUB 389 4,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanover Manufacturing Campus 1,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Hanover 1,090 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snyders-Lance, Inc.- Hanover Manufacturing Facility 850 FTE
NAT-TCR Creekwood Complex 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairchild Equipment - Burnsville 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Larkin Chase Center 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Field Erection Division 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE TownePlace Suites 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cole County Residential Srvs. Inc. - Admin Bldg 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Service Solutions, Inc 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn Merrillville 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.