Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric · Michigan

JH Campbell Annex

West Olive, MI · ~172 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JH Campbell Annex runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric workplace, earning a grade B.

JH Campbell Annex: 0.6 TCR = 53% of Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JH Campbell Annex safety composite

JH Campbell Annex scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

JH Campbell Annex: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2024

JH Campbell Annex's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · West Olive, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.6 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #4/24
  • PHOTO FRESH MEADOW POWER /…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FRESH MEADOW POWER / NE, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

JH Campbell Annex in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JH Campbell Annex averages 0.6 TCR (53% of the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JH Campbell Annex TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 1.2

Where JH Campbell Annex falls in its industry

846 Power generation, fossil fuel establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 24 Power generation, fossil fuel employers in Michigan.

JH Campbell Annex (172 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate JH Campbell Annex
JH Campbell Annex (172 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

JH Campbell Annex has more employees than the Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 0.6 3 1 0
2023 2.6 1.4 6 3 0
2022 0.8 0.5 2 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MI · West Olive

846 Power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, gas, oil), electric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 9 employers in West Olive, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FRESH MEADOW POWER / NE, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WILLIAMS STEAM PLANT 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forney Power Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brame Energy Center 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spence Brothers 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE UNIT855 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kamps Corporate 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE GRAND RAPIDS, MI 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ottawa County 1,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ottawa County - West Olive Campus 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR JH Campbell 1&2 170 FTE
CITY-NEAR JH Campbell 3 139 FTE
NAT-TCR Veranova -WD 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Manitowoc Cranes Inc- Manitowoc, WI 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Vadens Acoustics & Drywall 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR West Virginia - Non Metals 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Police Services 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tindall Corporation - Texas Division 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Daniel OConnells Sons Inc 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1100 LKQ Crystal River 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.