Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · South Carolina

Williams Steam Plant

Goose Creek, SC · ~80 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Williams Steam Plant runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade B.

Williams Steam Plant: 0.6 TCR = 53% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Williams Steam Plant safety composite

Williams Steam Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Williams Steam Plant: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.16× in 2024

Williams Steam Plant's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Goose Creek, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.6 · 53% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO JH Campbell Annex
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JH Campbell Annex (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Williams Steam Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Williams Steam Plant averages 0.6 TCR (53% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Williams Steam Plant TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 1.2

Where Williams Steam Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in South Carolina.

Williams Steam Plant (80 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Williams Steam Plant
Williams Steam Plant (80 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Williams Steam Plant has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · SC · Goose Creek

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 85 employers in Goose Creek, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JH Campbell Annex 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FRESH MEADOW POWER / NE, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forney Power Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brame Energy Center 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NNOB - VC Summer Units 1, 2, 3 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHARLESTON GAS OPERATIONS 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Charleston Sewer District 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar - Coastal Carolinas (Myrtle Beach) 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR APS-3 KBR 575 FTE
CITY-NEAR APS-3 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR W. International SC, LLC 499 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2928 473 FTE
NAT-TCR Varex Imaging, Liverpool 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Universidad Ana G. Mendez - Barceloneta 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Andrew Jordan Industrial LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NP Town Center Amusements, Inc., LLC - dba Barley's Casino & Brewing Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE CIVCO Medical Solutions - HQ 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Bodegon Grocery #5, Inc. 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hometown Mechanical 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crystal Lake LLC 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.