Arborist services · Michigan

J.H. Hart Company, Inc.

Sterling Heights, MI · ~40 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J.H. Hart Company, Inc. runs at 355% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Arborist services workplace, earning a grade F.

J.H. Hart Company, Inc.: 16.0 TCR = 355% of Arborist services BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J.H. Hart Company, Inc. safety composite

J.H. Hart Company, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 24.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

J.H. Hart Company, Inc. held a steady TCR band

J.H. Hart Company, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 30.8 in 2016 to 30.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 30.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=30.8 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=6.1 · 2022=24.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=30.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Sterling Heights, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.0 · 355% of ind

  • DART 24.4 DART
  • RANK #87/91
  • PHOTO Senske Lawn and Tree…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Senske Lawn and Tree Care - Couer d'Alene Branch (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

J.H. Hart Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J.H. Hart Company, Inc. averages 16.0 TCR (355% of the Arborist services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J.H. Hart Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=30.8 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=13.9 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=6.1 · 2022=24 · 2023=0 · 2024=30.4 · BLS 4.5

Where J.H. Hart Company, Inc. falls in its industry

2,875 Arborist services establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 91 Arborist services employers in Michigan.

J.H. Hart Company, Inc. (40 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate J.H. Hart Company, Inc.
J.H. Hart Company, Inc. (40 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

J.H. Hart Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Arborist services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 30.4 24.4 10 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 24.0 6.0 6 2 0
2020 6.1 6.1 2 0 0
2019 9.7 9.7 3 0 0
2018 13.9 13.9 4 0 0
2017 13.1 3.3 4 0 0
2016 30.8 10.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · MI · Sterling Heights

2,875 Arborist services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 195 employers in Sterling Heights, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Senske Lawn and Tree Care - Couer d'Alene Branch 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Telluride Nivalis 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Senske Lawn and Tree Care - Idaho Falls Branch 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leaf & Limb, LLC 15.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Basket Orchards, Inc 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shelbyville, MI 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan & Jerrys Pineview Greenhouse LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thumb Electric Cooperative of Michigan 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Heights Assembly Plant 5,783 FTE
CITY-NEAR STERLING PLNT 2,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sterling Stamping Plant 2,115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Conti, LLC 1,892 FTE
NAT-TCR Shellco Construction Corp. 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Administration 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0138 Issaquah 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1017 16.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hogan Glass, LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Office 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE A-TEC - Elgin 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE WBASC Wilkes-Barre Service Center 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.