Automobile racing teams · North Carolina

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV

Huntersville, NC · ~79 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automobile racing teams workplace, earning a grade D.

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV: 4.1 TCR = 133% of Automobile racing teams BLS 3.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV safety composite

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV: 3.0 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2021

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV's TCR rose 1.5 from 3.0 in 2019 to 4.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 711219 · Huntersville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 133% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #10/11
  • PHOTO Joe Gibbs Racing LLC…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Joe Gibbs Racing LLC - NC: XFN, DEV (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV averages 4.1 TCR (133% of the Automobile racing teams BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV TCR series: 2019=3 · 2020=5 · 2021=4.5 · BLS 3.1

Where Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV falls in its industry

28 Automobile racing teams establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 11 Automobile racing teams employers in North Carolina.

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV (79 employees, TCR 4.1) among 15 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 16 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV
Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV (79 employees, TCR 4.1) among 15 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 111 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Joe Gibbs Racing, Inc - NC: XFN, MX, DEV has fewer employees than the Automobile racing teams median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.5 1.5 3 0 0
2020 5.0 1.6 3 0 0
2019 3.0 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

711219 · NC · Huntersville

28 Automobile racing teams employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 117 employers in Huntersville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Joe Gibbs Racing LLC - NC: XFN, DEV 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aquatics 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sam Houston Race Park 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Feld Entertainment - Poplar Branch 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Peak Resources Wilmington 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Binderholz Enfield LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trader Joe's 0747 Wilmington 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE 02582 - STORE # 2582 WILKESBORO 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGuire Nuclear 1,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Huntersville Medical Center 1,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntersville Field Support Center 929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metrolina Greenhouses - Huntersville NC 725 FTE
NAT-TCR Waco Beverages 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rehab Transportation 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR USCS- Quakertown, PA 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Werner Enterprises/FONCA Terminal 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cook Sales Inc Illinois 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockmore Contracting Corp. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inspired Living at Lakewood Ranch 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rollie Williams Paint Spot LLC 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.