Fabricated structural metal manufacturing · California

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc.

Pittsburg, CA · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. runs at 145% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fabricated structural metal manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc.: 4.8 TCR = 145% of Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. safety composite

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.6

2017→2024

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 15.6 from 15.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.6 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=9.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Pittsburg, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 145% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/66
  • PHOTO Western States Metal…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Western States Metal Roofing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. averages 4.8 TCR (145% of the Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. TCR series: 2017=15.6 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,491 Fabricated structural metal ma establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 66 Fabricated structural metal ma employers in California.

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. (26 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Joel Hewatt Co., Inc.
Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. (26 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Joel Hewatt Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Fabricated structural metal manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.3 4.1 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.0 9.0 2 0 0
2018 5.6 5.6 1 0 0
2017 15.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · CA · Pittsburg

1,491 Fabricated structural metal manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 75 employers in Pittsburg, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Western States Metal Roofing 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Qualico Miscellaneous, Inc. (QMI) 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCI - 027 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ShoreMaster Main 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE HAULING & TRAILER SHOP 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seasholtz Co., LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Valley Vineyards 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Central Coast Vineyards 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR USS POSCO INDUSTRIES, INC 601 FTE
CITY-NEAR USS UPI 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legacy Framers Inc. 441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corteva Agriscience - Pittsburg Operations 290 FTE
NAT-TCR Mount Desert Island Hospital 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Orangeburg Department of Public Utilities 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TLS Tulsa 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR TR Pipe Inc 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toshiba Business Solutions - Miami Lakes 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toshiba Business Solutions - Boston 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wisconsin Rapids 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Port Washington Service Center 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.