Distribution line, sewer and water, construction · New York

TR Pipe Inc

College Point, NY · ~38 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TR Pipe Inc runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution line, sewer and water, construction workplace, earning a grade D.

TR Pipe Inc: 4.8 TCR = 171% of Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TR Pipe Inc safety composite

TR Pipe Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.9

2017→2024

TR Pipe Inc injury rate improved

TR Pipe Inc's TCR fell 14.9 from 14.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=19.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · College Point, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 171% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #65/71
  • PHOTO Joel Kennedy Constru…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Joel Kennedy Constructing Corp. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

TR Pipe Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TR Pipe Inc averages 4.8 TCR (171% of the Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TR Pipe Inc TCR series: 2017=14.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=19.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where TR Pipe Inc falls in its industry

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and w establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 71 Distribution line, sewer and w employers in New York.

TR Pipe Inc (38 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate TR Pipe Inc
TR Pipe Inc (38 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

TR Pipe Inc has fewer employees than the Distribution line, sewer and water, cons median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 19.9 9.9 2 2 2
2022 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 14.9 12.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · NY · College Point

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and water, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 37 employers in College Point, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Joel Kennedy Constructing Corp. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR R & R Pipeline INC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR W-Brown Enterprises, INC 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Utility Construction 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spruce Haven Farm, LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora-Oakwood Dairy, LLC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eldred Brothers / Main Farm 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanehan Family Dairy, LLC 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1150 - College Point 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHL USA, INC. -TEXAS LOCATION 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR NY_College Point_109-15 14th Ave_44000100 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1964-00130257 307 FTE
NAT-TCR TLS Tulsa 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vancrest of Eaton 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Harner Plumbing, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tippah Electric Power Association 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE SBS Construction - Corporate Office 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Eastern Resort Corporation - Charlottesville Office 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE LWR Communities, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE SNS Iron Works, Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.