General freight trucking, local · Pennsylvania

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal

Portersville, PA · ~31 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General freight trucking, local workplace, earning a grade D.

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal: 7.8 TCR = 173% of General freight trucking, local BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal safety composite

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal: 10.1 → 111.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 111.1 TCR · DART/TCR 14.24× in 2024

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal's TCR rose 101.0 from 10.1 in 2022 to 111.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 14.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484110 · Portersville, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.8 · 173% of ind

  • DART 111.1 DART
  • RANK #143/194
  • PHOTO Mondelez Global - St…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mondelez Global - Streetsboro DSD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal averages 7.8 TCR (173% of the General freight trucking, local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal TCR series: 2022=10.1 · 2023=5.5 · 2024=111.1 · BLS 4.5

Where John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal falls in its industry

2,784 General freight trucking, loca establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #143 safest of 194 General freight trucking, loca employers in Pennsylvania.

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal (31 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal
John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal (31 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.7

John Brown Trucking Portersville Terminal has fewer employees than the General freight trucking, local median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 111.1 111.1 1 0 0
2023 5.5 3.6 3 0 0
2022 10.1 5.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484110 · PA · Portersville

2,784 General freight trucking, local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 5 employers in Portersville, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mondelez Global - Streetsboro DSD 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Cartage Company Inc 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 805 SLNP TRANSPORT DISPATCH 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hopedale 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spawn Plant 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest Mushrooms 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLSC Cocalico Service Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenixville Service Building 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adams Mfg 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR 483013-Prospect | PA | HOL-500 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR STA - Prospect 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Brown Portersville 38 FTE
NAT-TCR Niemco Fabricators Inc 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fergus Falls Community Behavioral Health Hospital 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ERMCO 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lutheran Life - Pleasant View 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE R & J Trucking Dayton Terminal 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Victus Group/Holiday Inn Palmdale 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE TPA1 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE WTPS Cahokia 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.