Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing · Illinois

John Deere Harvester Works

East Moline, IL · ~2,183 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John Deere Harvester Works runs at 176% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

John Deere Harvester Works: 5.8 TCR = 176% of Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John Deere Harvester Works safety composite

John Deere Harvester Works scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

John Deere Harvester Works: 4.7 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.79× in 2024

John Deere Harvester Works's TCR rose 1.4 from 4.7 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · East Moline, IL ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 176% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #29/37
  • PHOTO Datepac LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 928 inj
  • SIZE ~2,183 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Datepac LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

John Deere Harvester Works in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John Deere Harvester Works averages 5.8 TCR (176% of the Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John Deere Harvester Works TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=4.4 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=4.1 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.3

Where John Deere Harvester Works falls in its industry

433 Combines (i.e., harvester-thre establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 37 Combines (i.e., harvester-thre employers in Illinois.

John Deere Harvester Works (2,183 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate John Deere Harvester Works
John Deere Harvester Works (2,183 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

John Deere Harvester Works has more employees than the Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 4.6 93 22 0
2023 7.6 5.2 158 28 0
2022 9.3 7.9 251 20 0
2021 6.3 4.9 83 27 0
2020 4.4 3.4 54 5 1
2019 4.1 2.9 69 16 0
2018 5.3 3.7 75 43 0
2017 4.4 3.2 61 35 0
2016 4.7 3.6 84 10 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · IL · East Moline

433 Combines (i.e., harvester-threshers) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 54 employers in East Moline, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Datepac LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Deere Paton 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rawhide Portable Corral INC. 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wylie & Son, Inc Manufacturing 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE MDW-INFLIGHT 2,181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobson Solutions 2,181 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0G01 - CORP LAKE FOREST, IL 2,187 FTE
STATE-SIZE ILJEF - JEFFERSON HUB 2,187 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Deere Global Crop Harvesting Product Development Center 663 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Deere Global Crop Harvesting PDC 622 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rock Island IL FXFE-RKI 260 FTE
CITY-NEAR RKI 253 FTE
NAT-TCR 081/Glendale 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Albany Office 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lancaster Location 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR lucky's foodland 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE WAH - East and West 2,183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kslen - Lenexa 2,183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Txdfa - Dallas/Fort Worth Airport Hub 2,183 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Nugget Lake Charles 2,182 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.