Attachments, powered lawn and garden equipment, manufacturing · Wisconsin

John Deere Horicon Works

Horicon, WI · ~1,248 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John Deere Horicon Works runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Attachments, powered lawn and garden equipment, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

John Deere Horicon Works: 4.9 TCR = 149% of Attachments, powered lawn and garden equipment, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John Deere Horicon Works safety composite

John Deere Horicon Works scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

John Deere Horicon Works held a steady TCR band

John Deere Horicon Works's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.1 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=11.0 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333112 · Horicon, WI ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #16/21
  • PHOTO Ariens Company
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 461 inj
  • SIZE ~1,248 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ariens Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

John Deere Horicon Works in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John Deere Horicon Works averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Attachments, powered lawn and garden equipment, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John Deere Horicon Works TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=11 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.3

Where John Deere Horicon Works falls in its industry

91 Attachments, powered lawn and establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 21 Attachments, powered lawn and employers in Wisconsin.

John Deere Horicon Works (1,248 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate John Deere Horicon Works
John Deere Horicon Works (1,248 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 3.6

John Deere Horicon Works has more employees than the Attachments, powered lawn and garden equ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 2.5 33 1 0
2023 4.6 2.3 56 9 0
2022 3.4 2.4 43 1 0
2021 5.1 3.6 48 11 0
2020 3.1 1.9 36 2 0
2019 3.6 2.3 48 5 0
2018 5.6 3.3 91 1 0
2017 11.0 8.6 52 34 0
2016 4.1 3.4 54 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333112 · WI · Horicon

91 Attachments, powered lawn and garden equipment, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 15 employers in Horicon, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ariens Company 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schiller Grounds Care, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECHO Incorporated 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oregon Tool - KC Blades 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE County of Kenosha 1,242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smithfield - Cudahy Packaged 1,241 FTE
STATE-SIZE OAK CREEK (WIOAK) 1,240 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milwaukee Electric Tool 1,263 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horicon 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advanced Disposal - Horicon 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advanced Disposal - Horicon Hauling 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gardner Manufacturing Company 80 FTE
NAT-TCR The Medical Center at Albany 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Temple Machine Shop, Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hematology/Oncology 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR American Laminates Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Louisa County Plant 1,248 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trace3, LLC 1,248 FTE
NAT-SIZE Instrumentation Laboratory 1,248 FTE
NAT-SIZE IGHL 1,248 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.