Buffing machines, handheld power-driven, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Milwaukee Electric Tool

Brookfield, WI · ~1,263 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Milwaukee Electric Tool runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Buffing machines, handheld power-driven, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Milwaukee Electric Tool: 0.8 TCR = 23% of Buffing machines, handheld power-driven, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Milwaukee Electric Tool safety composite

Milwaukee Electric Tool scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−265.9

2017→2018

Milwaukee Electric Tool injury rate improved

Milwaukee Electric Tool's TCR fell 265.9 from 266.7 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 266.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=266.7 · 2018=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333991 · Brookfield, WI AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Data Security, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 74 inj
  • SIZE ~1,263 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Data Security, Inc. (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Milwaukee Electric Tool in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Milwaukee Electric Tool averages 0.8 TCR (23% of the Buffing machines, handheld power-driven, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Milwaukee Electric Tool TCR series: 2017=266.7 · 2018=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Milwaukee Electric Tool falls in its industry

57 Buffing machines, handheld pow establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Buffing machines, handheld pow employers in Wisconsin.

Milwaukee Electric Tool (1,263 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Milwaukee Electric Tool
Milwaukee Electric Tool (1,263 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Milwaukee Electric Tool has more employees than the Buffing machines, handheld power-driven, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.8 0.1 18 2 0
2017 266.7 112.5 56 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333991 · WI · Brookfield

57 Buffing machines, handheld power-driven, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 141 employers in Brookfield, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Data Security, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW Residential & Renovation 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milwaukee Tool Corporate 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stanley Black and Decker Mission 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ariens Company 1,274 FTE
STATE-SIZE JBS Green Bay Inc 1,277 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Deere Horicon Works 1,248 FTE
STATE-SIZE PPD Madison 1,279 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIMIL103 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR WIMIL103 ASCENSION SE WI - ELMBROOK CAMPUS 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Premier Real Estate Management LLC 483 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guhring, Inc. - Wisconsin 336 FTE
NAT-TCR MS - Kennedy Space Center, FL - 1KSFL 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bowhead Logistics Solutions 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Georgetown 105 W Coopera (5268) 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - System Relay Services 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Line HealthCare 1,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE HMAPF01 1,263 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX - Irving - 2304 Century Center Blvd - The American Bottling Company 1,263 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.