General warehousing and storage · Oregon

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center

Portland, OR · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade C.

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center: 5.3 TCR = 91% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center safety composite

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center: 4.5 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2018

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center's TCR rose 0.7 from 4.5 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 91% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #53/103
  • PHOTO National Distributio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Distribution Centers LLC-1760 Intermodal Ave (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center averages 5.3 TCR (91% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=5.1 · BLS 5.8

Where John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 103 General warehousing and storag employers in Oregon.

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center (29 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center
John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center (29 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2017 6.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 4.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · OR · Portland

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-1760 Intermodal Ave 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dickies 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SNV1 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prime Now LLC - UCA1 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE GardenScape Nursery INC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coleman Ag 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers Administration Inc 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Port Westward 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR B-XII Danvers LLC 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte Hub (Nccha) 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Meadowlands (Njmea) 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospital Hill 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cdsd Boston (Haverhill) 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Battelle - Charlottesville Operations 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Parrish Medical Ctr Food 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.