Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid · Georgia

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta

Woodstock, GA · ~29 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta runs at 212% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid workplace, earning a grade F.

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta: 5.5 TCR = 212% of Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta safety composite

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta: 3.1 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2018

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta's TCR rose 0.6 from 3.1 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.7 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Woodstock, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.5 · 212% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #70/80
  • PHOTO S04069 - WM of NM - …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta averages 5.5 TCR (212% of the Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=3.7 · BLS 2.6

Where Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta falls in its industry

2,322 Waste hauling, local, nonhazar establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 80 Waste hauling, local, nonhazar employers in Georgia.

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta (29 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta
Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta (29 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Waste Services of Georgia-North Atlanta has fewer employees than the Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2017 9.7 9.7 3 0 0
2016 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · GA · Woodstock

2,322 Waste hauling, local, nonhazardous solid employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 87 employers in Woodstock, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S04069 - WM of NM - Hobbs Division 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Area Disposal Service Inc. Jacksonville HC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TrashAway Svcs (Duncan/San Angelo) - Republic Services of San Angelo 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S09359 - KC Container Repair Shop 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Valdosta TMC - 805 W. Savannah Ave. Valdosta, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metro South - 119 Smith Street Jonesboro 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tifton Operating - 1010 Bruce Lane Tifton, GA 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bainbridge Operating - 308 Airport Rd. Bainbridge, GA 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5275 423 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 575 378 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5275 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR 575 324 FTE
NAT-TCR Evansville Truck Center 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 30209-Capstone Delhaize Disputanta Va 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cypresswood SNF Operations, LLC D/B/A Villa Toscana 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ad Tape & Label Co., Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Parrish Medical Ctr Food 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE KWF Lakeland, FL 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Deere Portland Regional Distribution Center 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cdsd Boston (Haverhill) 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.