Painting (except roof) contractors · Ohio

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company

Columbus, OH · ~46 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Painting (except roof) contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company: 2.4 TCR = 84% of Painting (except roof) contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company safety composite

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2023→2024

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company injury rate improved

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238320 · Columbus, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/24
  • PHOTO JW Peterson Painting…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JW Peterson Painting, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company averages 2.4 TCR (84% of the Painting (except roof) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company TCR series: 2023=4.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company falls in its industry

582 Painting (except roof) contrac establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 24 Painting (except roof) contrac employers in Ohio.

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company (46 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company
Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company (46 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company has fewer employees than the Painting (except roof) contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238320 · OH · Columbus

582 Painting (except roof) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JW Peterson Painting, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AS Kansas Service Center 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1816 Industrial Way 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR F.A.K. Commercial Painting, Inc. 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holthouse Farms of Ohio Inc 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Ohio Greenhouse Company 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willowbend Nurseries, LLC 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc. 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR R&M Service Solutions LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 09 Grand Island 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 269 Godfrey 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoprite of Perth Amboy 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Guntersville Feedmill 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith Systems, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE HTI 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weeks Food Corp 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.