Painting and wallpapering · California

JW Peterson Painting, Inc.

Livermore, CA · ~188 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

JW Peterson Painting, Inc. runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Painting and wallpapering workplace, earning a grade C.

JW Peterson Painting, Inc.: 2.3 TCR = 84% of Painting and wallpapering BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

JW Peterson Painting, Inc. safety composite

JW Peterson Painting, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

JW Peterson Painting, Inc. injury rate improved

JW Peterson Painting, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.5 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238320 · Livermore, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/124
  • PHOTO Johnson and Fischer,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~188 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

JW Peterson Painting, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows JW Peterson Painting, Inc. averages 2.3 TCR (84% of the Painting and wallpapering BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

JW Peterson Painting, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where JW Peterson Painting, Inc. falls in its industry

582 Painting and wallpapering establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 124 Painting and wallpapering employers in California.

JW Peterson Painting, Inc. (188 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate JW Peterson Painting, Inc.
JW Peterson Painting, Inc. (188 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 2.8

JW Peterson Painting, Inc. has more employees than the Painting and wallpapering median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 2.8 2.8 5 0 0
2021 6.8 6.8 12 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 5 0 0
2019 0.2 0.2 7 0 0
2018 3.1 3.1 6 0 0
2016 0.5 0.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238320 · CA · Livermore

582 Painting and wallpapering employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Johnson and Fischer, Inc. DBA The JF Company 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arkansas Service Center 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zelinsky Company 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AS Kansas Service Center 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Independent Ag Inc. 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silva Farms LLC 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Agriculture 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Farm Labor, Inc. 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Durham Performing Arts Center 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Stafford Township Schools 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Hall Leesburg 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Location 3 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Turenne PharMedCo 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE C.H. Nickerson, & Co., Inc. 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Combined Systems Inc 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tennessee Family Solutions 188 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.