Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing · North Carolina

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division

Willow Spring, NC · ~44 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division: 5.4 TCR = 164% of Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division safety composite

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division: 0.0 → 2.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2023

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division's TCR rose 2.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327331 · Willow Spring, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 164% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Hanover Architectura…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hanover Architectural Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division averages 5.4 TCR (164% of the Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=8.6 · 2018=10.4 · 2019=7 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division falls in its industry

321 Blocks, concrete and cinder, m establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Blocks, concrete and cinder, m employers in North Carolina.

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division (44 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division
Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division (44 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Johnson Concrete Co.-Eastern Division has more employees than the Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2022 4.6 0.0 2 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 3 0 0
2020 5.3 5.3 3 0 0
2019 7.0 5.3 3 1 0
2018 10.4 5.2 4 2 0
2017 8.6 8.6 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327331 · NC · Willow Spring

321 Blocks, concrete and cinder, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 3 employers in Willow Spring, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hanover Architectural Products 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acker-Stone Industries, INC 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4419 - Shelby Bagging Plant 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR J. L. Anderson Company, Inc. 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Creek Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBEMARLE WMSTN 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morganton 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aqua Services, Inc. - Cary 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR WILLOW SPRING_1387820 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR 368632-WILLOW SPRING PO 21 FTE
NAT-TCR Highland Tank, LLC 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CentraCare Clinic Adult and Pediatric Urology 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Misa Metal Processing Birmingham, Alabama 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sycamore Precision Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manner USA 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Home 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6235 Hallandale 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sapulpa 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.