Water treatment and distribution · California

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant

Granada Hills, CA · ~75 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant runs at 393% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant: 4.7 TCR = 393% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant safety composite

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2024

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant injury rate improved

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant's TCR fell 1.3 from 2.9 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Granada Hills, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.7 · 393% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #86/176
  • PHOTO Apache Junction office
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Apache Junction office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant averages 4.7 TCR (393% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=7.4 · 2022=6 · 2023=7.7 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 176 Water treatment and distributi employers in California.

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant (75 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant
Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant (75 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Joseph Jensen Filtration Plant has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 7.7 4.6 5 0 0
2022 6.0 1.5 4 0 0
2021 7.4 4.4 5 0 0
2020 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 7.5 6.0 5 0 0
2018 3.1 1.5 1 1 0
2017 2.9 1.5 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Granada Hills

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 34 employers in Granada Hills, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Apache Junction office 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huntington Operations 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Municipal 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division of Water Product (CON-0224) 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunset Farms, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Managment, Inc 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESTVIEW BERRY FARMS 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE DJRAS CORP DBA PRIME HARVEST CONTRACTING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 457 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Granada Hills Charter 540 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2329 - Granada Hills 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR MWL Solutions Inc 158 FTE
NAT-TCR Mahuta Tool Corp 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Bluff Middle School 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pine River-Backus Schools 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR D&B Plating 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Austin Public Schools ISD#492-Banfield School 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Creative Builders, Inc. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE USC Elementary 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toga Manufacturing 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.