Electric power generation, nuclear · Alabama
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant
Columbia, AL · ~739 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- A
- Excellent Safety Record
- 0.2
- Avg TCR
- 1.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, nuclear workplace, earning a grade A.
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant: 0.2 TCR = 13% of Electric power generation, nuclear BLS 1.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant safety composite
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
60/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- C 0.16 per 100 workers
Safer than 60% of industry peers
- DART rate
- C 0 per 100 workers
Safer than 66% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 50% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant held a steady TCR band
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=0.0 · 2017=0.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.1
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 221113 · Columbia, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID
Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 13% of ind
- DART 0.0 DART
- RANK P60
- PHOTO Arkansas Nuclear One
- BOOK 5y book
- INJ 2 inj
- SIZE ~739 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Arkansas Nuclear One (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site 0.2
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant
0.2 TCR
- Arkansas Nucle 0.2
Arkansas Nuclear One
0.2 TCR
- River Bend Nuc 0.2
River Bend Nuclear Station
0.2 TCR
- Fitzpatrick Nu 0.1
Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant
0.1 TCR
- Catawba Nuclea 0.1
Catawba Nuclear
0.1 TCR
What this shows Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant averages 0.2 TCR (13% of the Electric power generation, nuclear BLS benchmark).
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.1 · BLS 1.2
Where Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant falls in its industry
80 Electric power generation, nuc establishmentsSafer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.2.
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant has more employees than the Electric power generation, nuclear median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
221113 · AL · Columbia
80 Electric power generation, nuclear employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Arkansas Nuclear One | 0.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | River Bend Nuclear Station | 0.2 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant | 0.1 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Catawba Nuclear | 0.1 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Adient | 739 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Brent | 740 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | CBE | 744 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Fairfield Tubular Operations | 745 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Piggly Wiggly (#508) | 25 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Trace3, LLC | 0.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Red Dog Operations | 0.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | R.B. Jergens | 0.2 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Custom Air Products and Services Inc. | 0.2 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | HSTXTXSM | 739 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | IRNHTXAB | 739 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | New Vista | 739 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Qorvo US, Inc. | 739 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.