Loading machines, underground mining, manufacturing · Texas

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC

Longview, TX · ~633 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Loading machines, underground mining, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC: 1.1 TCR = 32% of Loading machines, underground mining, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC safety composite

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2021→2024

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC injury rate improved

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.3 in 2021 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.3 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333131 · Longview, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #2/13
  • PHOTO National Avenue
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~633 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: National Avenue (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Joy Global Longview Operations LLC averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Loading machines, underground mining, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC TCR series: 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Joy Global Longview Operations LLC falls in its industry

105 Loading machines, underground establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 13 Loading machines, underground employers in Texas.

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC (633 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Joy Global Longview Operations LLC
Joy Global Longview Operations LLC (633 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Joy Global Longview Operations LLC has more employees than the Loading machines, underground mining, ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.3 4 2 0
2023 0.8 0.6 6 0 0
2022 1.3 0.6 7 2 0
2021 1.3 1.0 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333131 · TX · Longview

105 Loading machines, underground mining, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 259 employers in Longview, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR National Avenue 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schenck Process LLC - Naperville 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR FLSmidth USA Inc. - Tucson Operations 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Martin Engineering 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sadler's Smokehouse 633 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Creek Construction 632 FTE
STATE-SIZE DAL-ODFL 634 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keystone Concrete Placement/Keystone Sitework/Stewart Builders Houston 635 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longview - GSMC 155 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Shepherd Medical Center - Longview 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company 1,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Operations 1,500 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Hoyt Lakes - General 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR QuantumScape Battery, Inc. SJ1 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Particle Board 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lewis County PUD - Main Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wendell 633 FTE
NAT-SIZE Murfreesboro Bakery 633 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fauquier Hospital 633 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cummins Turbo Technologies 633 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.